We all remember the brave UC Berkeley students standing up earlier this year to a paramilitary-like college police force armed with millions of dollars worth of riot-suppression gear (which they never needed in the first place). How could we forget? The images of the UC cops bathing peaceful protestors in showers of pepper spray cause more than one OMG in this country, especially among those left in this country who still have possess some notion of justice or fairplay.
Now assuming peaceful protestors on UC Berkely campus have no right under the code or spirit of American law to protest in the first place, we arrive at RECOMMENDATION 11 of the ROBINSON-EDLEY REPORT (created by UC Berkeley employees at a cost of several hundred thousand, btw):
So this report, at a huge cost to the college, administered and presented by UCB professors, recommends their guard dogs tackle peaceful protestors (who are within their democratic right to protest) and proceed to throw them down and wrestle them to the ground. Can you imagine? Can you believe this crap? Seriously, scores of campus cops lunging on command at a line of protestors just standing there, putting them in headlocks, body-slamming them, laying on top of them? This is exactly what they're proposing. They figure this is less force than pepper spray or whacking someone with a baton? Well, maybe it is, but there is something very very sick about this whole reasoning, this report, and the associated circumstances.
This is old news, really, but the vast majority of Americans have no idea. Even more Californians appear to have no idea. I just find it incredible and disturbing.
And bonus for the admins and their flying monkeys, the use of this type of force will make resistance very likely and therefore justify escalation.
I firmly think that's the real plan.
Now assuming peaceful protestors on UC Berkely campus have no right under the code or spirit of American law to protest in the first place, we arrive at RECOMMENDATION 11 of the ROBINSON-EDLEY REPORT (created by UC Berkeley employees at a cost of several hundred thousand, btw):
When faced with protesters who are non-aggressively linking arms, and when the event response team has determined that a physical response is required, principles should specify that administrators should authorize the police to use hands-on pain compliance techniques rather than higher levels of force (e.g., pepper spray, batons)...Hands-on pain compliance? What does that mean? Quite simply, guys, it means that "liberal college" in CA recommends that it's paramilitary force be allowed to physically attack peaceful protestors with a variety of grappling holds and wrestling pins. Here is an explanation on Wikipedia.
So this report, at a huge cost to the college, administered and presented by UCB professors, recommends their guard dogs tackle peaceful protestors (who are within their democratic right to protest) and proceed to throw them down and wrestle them to the ground. Can you imagine? Can you believe this crap? Seriously, scores of campus cops lunging on command at a line of protestors just standing there, putting them in headlocks, body-slamming them, laying on top of them? This is exactly what they're proposing. They figure this is less force than pepper spray or whacking someone with a baton? Well, maybe it is, but there is something very very sick about this whole reasoning, this report, and the associated circumstances.
This is old news, really, but the vast majority of Americans have no idea. Even more Californians appear to have no idea. I just find it incredible and disturbing.
And bonus for the admins and their flying monkeys, the use of this type of force will make resistance very likely and therefore justify escalation.
I firmly think that's the real plan.
No comments:
Post a Comment